Consider the diagram and proof by contradiction. Given: ABC with ZB ZC
Prove: ABAC
It is given that ZB ~ 2C. Assume AB and AC are not
congruent. If AB > AC, then m2C>m ZB by
If AC > AB, then mZB>m2C for the same reason.
However, using the given statement and the definition of
congruency, we know that m ZB = m 2C. Therefore, AB
= AC and AB AC.
A
What is the missing reason in the proof?
O converse of the triangle parts relationship theorem
O substitution
O definition of congruency
converse of the isosceles triangle theorerything
B
с

8

step-by-step explanation:

segment bisector

step-by-step explanation:

line segment bisector. definition: a line, ray or segment which cuts another line segment into two equal parts. try this drag one of the orange dots at a or b and note the the line ab always divides the line pq into two equal parts.

mark brainliest!

g(x) = 3*(8(3^(x−2))+2)

g(x) = 24 (3^(x-2) )+6

the factor is 2

step-by-step explanation:

let f(x)=8(3^(x−2)+2)

to stretch a graph by 3, it would be 3f(x)

g(x) =3f(x)

g(x) = 3*(8(3^(x−2))+2)

g(x) = 24 (3^(x-2) )+6

x     −2     0     2     4     6

f(x) 1/64 1/16   1/4     1     4

1/64 * z * z = 1/16

i multiplies by z twice because it its 2 steps from -2 to 0

1/64 z^2 = 1/16

multiply by 64 to clear the fraction on the left side

1/4 * 64 z^2 =1/16 *64

z^2 = 4

take the square root of each side

sqrt(z^2) = ±sqrt(4)

z = ±2  

we are multiplying by 2 each time.

i have no