Which plan would cost less in fencing? Explain. Design 1, because it requires 12 fewer feet of fencing than Design 2 Design 1, because it requires 24 fewer feet of fencing than Design 2 Design 2, because it requires 12 fewer feet of fencing than Design 1 Design 2, because it requires 24 fewer feet of fencing than Design 1

just do 5.2 + 2 ( 7.2) and 1/3 x 3 (.9) and youv'e got your equation. 0.9( 9/10) + 7.2 ^2 = 16.4 hope i could !

step-by-step explanation:

the smallest possible measurement of the width is 14 feet

step-by-step explanation:

let's assume length of parallelogram is 'l'

width of parallelogram is 'w'

the perimeter of a parallelogram must be no less than 40 feet

so, we get

we are given

length of parallelogram is 6 feet

so,

l=6

we can plug it

now, we can solve for w

subtract both sides by 12

divide both sides by 2

and we get

so,

the smallest possible measurement of the width is 14 feet

all the angles opposite to the angle 150 would be 150 and all the angles that are next to 150 are 30 because they equal 180 it you add it up.

step-by-step explanation: