Consider the figure below. Given: PM PN, LM 1MNMN 1 ON
LN bisects ZMNO, OM bisects LLMN
Which of the following statements is enough to prove AMPLANPO?
A
If proving LP OP by Isosceles Triangle Theorem, and LM ON using substitution, then
AMPL a ANPO because of SSS.
B
If proving 2MPL 2 2NPO because they are vertical angles, and LMP LONP because of
definition of angle bisectors, then AMPL 2 ANPO because of ASA.
If proving LP = OP by Isosceles Triangle Theorem, and 2MPLZNPO because they are
vertical angles, then AMPL DANPO because of SAS.
If PM PN, LM 1 MNMN 1 ON, LN bisects ZMNO, OM bisects ZIMN are given statements,
then there is enough to prove AMPLANPO by AAS.