given the following constraints which solution is a feasible solution for a maximaition problem 4x1 3x2 <18

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Acircle has a diameter will endpoints of (-2,8) and (6, 4). what is the center of the circle

Pepe and leo deposits money into their savings account at the end of the month the table shows the account balances. if there pattern of savings continue and neither earns interest nor withdraw any of the money , how will the balance compare after a very long time ?