LaTasha was presented with the following data set and argued that there was no correlation between x and y. Is LaTasha correct? Use the regression equation to explain your reasoning. A 2-row table with 7 columns. The first row is labeled x with entries 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. The second row is labeled y with entries 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4.

the two may have that, even a breakdown is probably offered

x + y = 90 5x – 10y = 90 90 – 10y = 5x 90 + 10y = 5x

step-by-step explanation:

last month maria hiked the 5-mile mountain trail a number of times and she hiked the 10-mile canal trail several times. let x represent the number of times she hiked the 5-mile trail, and let y represent the number of times she hiked the 10-mile trail. if she hiked a total of 90 miles, which equation can be used to find the number of times maria hiked each trail? x + y = 90 5x – 10y = 90 90 – 10y = 5x 90 + 10y = 5x

i think it is 18

step-by-step explanation: