Alva wants to prove that opposite sides in a parallelogram are congruent. A A B B C C D D E E Alva says: "I can prove this by establishing the congruence of a single pair of triangles." Which pair of triangles is Alva referring to, and which criterion should she use for establishing congruence? Choose 1 Choose 1 (Choice A) A △ A B C △ABCtriangle, A, B, C and △ C D A △CDAtriangle, C, D, A by angle-side-angle (Choice B) B △ A B C △ABCtriangle, A, B, C and △ C D A △CDAtriangle, C, D, A by side-angle-side (Choice C) C △ A B E △ABEtriangle, A, B, E and △ C D E △CDEtriangle, C, D, E by angle-side-angle (Choice D) D △ A B E △ABEtriangle, A, B, E and △ C D E △CDEtriangle, C, D, E by side-angle-side

the answer is 200

step-by-step explanation:

the way the question is worded, it seems to imply the $264 interest is simple interest, not compound interest.

the simple interest for 2 years is $264; the simple interest for 1 year is $132.

$132 interest on a $600 investment means an interest rate of (132/600)*100 = 22%.

the value of $200 at 22% interest compounded annually for three years is

200%281.22%29%5e3

the amount of interest is that value, minus the original $200.

answer:   segregation violated the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment, which holds that no state can “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

details/explanation:

brown v. board of education of topeka, decided by the us supreme court in 1954, ruled that all americans are entitled to the same civil liberties and protections in regard to access to education. until that decision, it was legal to segregate schools according to race, so that black students could not attend the same schools as white students.   an older supreme court decision, plessy v. ferguson (1896), had said that separate, segregated public facilities were acceptable as long as the facilities offered were equal in quality.   in the case of brown v. board of education, that standard was challenged and defeated.   segregation was shown to create inequality, and the supreme court unanimously ruled segregation to be unconstitutional.

the ruling was important in advancing civil rights because it affirmed that the 14th amendment applies to all rights and privileges of citizens, including access to   education.   this was being violated by states whose laws supported the segregation of schools.   section 1 of the 14th amendment reads as follows:

●yes, this statement is absolutely apt.

hope this you