The prosecutor claims: "There is a 1% chance that the defendant would have the crime blood type if he were innocent. Thus, there is 99% chance that he is guilty." This is known as prosecutor’s fallacy. What is wrong with this argument?

-1   1/6.   you dont subtract the denominators

step-by-step explanation:

c.the first excerpt shows their expectations about the camp, and the second shows the reality of their circumstances

is the answer this is because first they talk about what is expected of the camp but in the second excerpt they get a harsh awakening to the true realities of the camp.

hope this

i would appreciate brainliest : )

p< -25

t> 12

r> 17

step-by-step explanation:

you need to know that the corresponding sides and angles are the same.