Explain how the distance formula can be used to find the diameter of a circle?

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

The table shows the webster family’s monthly expenses for the first three months of the year. they are $2,687.44, $2,613.09, and $2,808.64. what is the average monthly expenditure for all expenses?

If i have one apple and give you the apple, how many apples do i have?