Cassandra is trying to think of a good way to keep her financial records. she makes a lot of purchases, using cash, debit cards, and credit cards about equally. when she gets home every day, she tends to be very tired and doesn’t like to do a lot of organized thinking. she tends to lose individual pieces of paper if she doesn’t file them immediately. what might be a good method for cassandra to use? a. recording all of her daily expenditures in an organizational computer program. b. keeping and collecting receipts for everything she buys. c. tracking and collecting her bank and credit statement

d is the right answer i just took the test on edge

Step-by-step explanation:

Cassandra is trying to think of a good way to keep her financial records. She makes a lot of purchases, using cash, debit cards, and credit cards about equally. When she gets home every day, she tends to be very tired and doesn’t like to do a lot of organized thinking. She tends to lose individual pieces of paper if she doesn’t file them immediately. What might be a good method for Cassandra to use?

a.

Recording all of her daily expenditures in an organizational computer program.

b.

Keeping and collecting receipts for everything she buys.

c.

Tracking and collecting her bank and credit statements every month.

d.

Carrying a notebook and immediately recording all of her transactions in it.

answer: 177/8

step-by-step explanation:

no oblique asymptote

step-by-step explanation:

to find the oblique asymptote of f(x)

here numerator has degree 1 and denomintor degree 2

degree of numerator < degree of denominator

hence there is no oblique asymptote

when the degree of the denominator > that of the numerator, we saw that the value in the denominator got so much bigger, so quickly,   giving us a horizontal asymptote of the x-axis. or we can write

f(x) = a polynomial of x + a proper fraction.

in this case only we have oblique asymptotes but not when numerator has less degree.