Triangle abc has been dilated to form triangle a'b'c'. if sides ab and a'b' are proportional, what is the least amount of additional information needed to determine if the two triangles are similar? angles b and b' are congruent, and angles c and c' are congruent. segments ac and a'c' are congruent, and segments bc and b'c' are congruent. angle c=c', angle b=b', and segments bc and b'c' are congruent. segment bc=b'c', segment ac=a'c', and angles b and b' are congruent.

When considering similar triangles, we need congruent angles and proportional sides.

Hence
"Angles B and B' are congruent, and angles C and C' are congruent." is sufficient to prove similarity of two triangles.

"Segments AC and A'C' are congruent, and segments BC and B'C' are congruent." does not prove anything because we know nothing about the angles.

"Angle C=C', angle B=B', and segments BC and B'C' are congruent." would prove ABC is congruent to A'B'C' if and only if AB is congruent to A'B' (not just proportional).

"Segment BC=B'C', segment AC=A'C', and angles B and B' are congruent" is not sufficient to prove similarity nor congruence because SSA is not generally sufficient.

To conclude, the first option is sufficient to prove similarity (AAA)

In all honesty, there really is no “work” per say to show. mainly it’s just using the process of elimination. the question is asking which domain(s) would be the most appropriate for the function c(n). n is the number of observed vehicles so right away, 1, 2, and 3 can be eliminated.why? 1, 2 start in the negatives and therefore it is impossible to observe negative cars. so, #4 would be the best answer to the given problem.

Wow. that is a really cool question.