Kylie explained that (–4x + 9)2 will result in a difference of squares because (–4x + 9)2 = (–4x)2 + (9)2 = 16x2 + 81. which statement best describes kylie’s explanation? answer is c, (kylie did not understand that this is a perfect square trinomial, and she did not determine the product correctly.)

In fact this equation:

Is a perfect square trinomial, which is a polynomial of three terms that results from squaring a binomial (two terms); and the correct way to solve it is:

Then, according to (2), the binomial (1) is solved as follows:

>>>>>>>This is the righ answer

Therefore, Kylie did not determine the product correctly

answer: 0+0=0

step-by-step explanation:

that is the only answer that can make 0

idk

step-by-step explanation:

i don't know