Use δpqr below to answer the question that follows: triangle pqr with sides pr and qr intersected by segment st. which fact is not used to prove that pqr is similar to str? segments st and pq are parallel. angle p is congruent to itself due to the reflexive property. rp is a transversal line passing st and pq. angles rts and rqp are congruent due to the corresponding angles postulate

The fact ' is congruent to itself due to reflexive property' is not used to prove that

Step-by-step explanation:

Here we have a triangle PQR in which ST is the line segment which joins the points S and T where and

Now let

And, here PR is the common transversal which passes through the parallel lines ST and PQ.

So, In triangles PQR and STR,

( reflexive )

( by corresponding angle postulate)

Thus, ( by AA postulate of similarity)

Therefore, from the above proof we can say that except the fact ' is congruent to itself' we are using all the given options.

step-by-step explanation:

we can use this expression to calculate the energy gain as a particle moves with a field or the energy loss as it moves against it. (note that it is also used to define the electron-volt, a unit of energy equal to that gained by an electron as it falls through a pd of 1 v, i.e. w = 1 ev = 1.6 10-19 c 1 v = 1.6 10-19j).in fact this expression is really nothing more than the statement that potential is the potential energy per unit charge. in this case, v= w/qis simply stating that the change in potential energy(or work done) per unit charge is equal to the change in potential (or potential difference), v.student questions: uniform electric fields2electron beamcathode+5 kvanode0 v