Stock f had a price change of –4 dollars and stock g had a price change of +1 dollars. brody said stock g had a greater price change because a positive integer is greater than a negative integer. is his statement correct? explain why or why not

No, his statement is not correct. Brody confused value and magnitude. |–4| = 4, and |+1| = 1. The magnitude of –4 is greater than the magnitude of +1. Stock F had a greater price change

Answer and step-by-step explanation:

Brody is incorrect.

The price change would be the absolute value of these numbers.  This means that Stock F changed |-4| = 4 and Stock G changed |+1| = 1.  Since 4 is greater than 1, Stock F had a greater price change.

example 2 – simplify: step 1: completely factor both the numerators and denominators of all fractions. step 2: change the division sign to a multiplication sign and flip (or reciprocate) the fraction after the division sign; essential you need to multiply by the reciprocal. step 3 : cancel or reduce the fractions.

it’s the first one your welcome