Physics, 29.06.2019 19:30 Bailey1116680

The diagrams show the movement of particles for two substances. which best compares the temperatures of the substances? substance x has the highest temperature because its particles have more kinetic energy. substance x has the highest temperature because it has fewer particles. substance y has the highest temperature because its particles have more kinetic energy. substance y has the highest temperature because it has more particles

The diagrams show the movement of particles for two substances. which best compares the temperatures

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: tabyers2645

Substance X has the highest temperature because its particles have more kinetic energy.

The temperature of a substance is directly proportional to the average kinetic energy of its particles, according to the equation,

$KE = \dfrac{3}{2}kT$

Here,

k is the Boltzmann's constant.

T is the absolute temperature of the substance.

In the given problem, he particles in the two substances have same mass, but particles of substance X travel faster than particles of substance Y, and since the average kinetic energy depends on the square of the speed of the particles as,

$KE = \dfrac{1}{2}mv^{2}$

So higher the temperature, higher will be the molecular vibration and more will the speed. And alternatively, more will be the value of kinetic energy.

Thus, we can conclude that the particles in substance X have more kinetic energy than particles in substance Y, therefore substance X has higher temperature than substance Y.

Learn more about the kinetic energy here:

link

Answer from: jeanieb

Substance X has the highest temperature because its particles have more kinetic energy.

Explanation:

The temperature of a substance is directly proportional to the average kinetic energy of its particles, according to the equation:

$E_K = \frac{3}{2}kT$

where

E_K is the average kinetic energy of the particles

k is the Boltzmann's constant

T is the absolute temperature of the substance

In this problem, we see that the particles in the two substances have same mass, but particles of substance X travel faster than particles of substance Y, and since the average kinetic energy depends on the square of the speed of hte particles:

$E_K=\frac{1}{2}mv^2$

we can conclude that particles in substance X have more kinetic energy than particles in substance Y, therefore substance X has higher temperature than substance Y.

Answer from: Quest

It was crowded with sewer like smells. bad sewer systems

Answer from: Quest

a. carbon dioxide, i took the test and got it right.

Another question on Physics

Physics, 21.06.2019 23:30

Ais not a compound machine. a. bolt b. shovel c. handcart (dolly) d. see-saw (teeter totter)

Answers: 2

Answer

Physics, 22.06.2019 00:30

Comedians like to joke that the reason we havenâ€™t been visited by intelligent life from elsewhere in the universe is that aliens have been monitoring earthâ€™s broadcasts of intellectually embarrassing tv programs, like gilliganâ€™s island, fear factor, the jersey shore, and the jerry springer showand so consider us far too primitive to merit a visit. letâ€™s check the assertion that aliens could have been receiving them. tv programs are broadcast at a frequency of about 100mhz with about 100kw of total power in 30frames per second, which emanatesroughly uniformly in all directions. assume that interstellar space transmits these broadcasts without attenuation. no matter how smart they are, aliens would require at least one photon per frame to interpret our signals. findthe number of photons per unit time per unit area reaching a receiver on a possible planet in the nearest star system, which is about 4 light-years away (a light-year is the distance light travels in a year). if aliens aimed a receiver or detector directly at earth, how big (in diameter) would it have to be to receive a photon per frame

Answers: 2

Answer

Physics, 23.06.2019 16:00

5m/swhenhereaches and even steeper slope. if he accelerates at 2 m/s2 for the 5 m slope, how fast is he traveling when he reaches the bottom of the 5 m slope?

Answers: 1

Answer

Physics, 23.06.2019 18:50

Brian is speaking to you and a group of friends. he explains that nuclear power plants are essentially nuclear bombs waiting to explode. this is very worrisome to your friends. which statement is best suited to discredit brian and put your friends at ease? select all that apply. -nuclear power plants and nuclear bombs both use nuclear fission to generate energy, but a nuclear power plant very precisely controls the intensity of the reaction while a nuclear bomb releases the energy in one big explosion. -nuclear power plants use nuclear fusion to generate energy, but a nuclear bomb relies on nuclear fission. since, their reactants differ, their reactions differ. -nuclear power plants have never exploded in their 60 year history. -you agree with brian's statement.

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

The diagrams show the movement of particles for two substances. which best compares the temperatures...

Questions