Okay so this is a "law of conservation of energy" type of question. it's simple but i was absent for a week and im completely lost so i need an explanation.

we rolled a golfball down a ramp (once at 0.3 m and 0.45 m).
the initial potential energy was 0.135 joules (at 0.3 m) and the other initial potential energy was 0.203 joules (0.45 m)

if u need the median times:
0.45 m = 0.91 s
0.3 m = 1.42 s
so my question is.. does the experiment demonstrate law of conservation?
why or why not
and finally if it does.. how? ?

In the derivation of rrkm theory, a factor of 1/2 is introduced when equalizing the rates of formation and decomposition of activated complex as keal-hr) = ko this is clearly against the assumption of transition state theory that states all the activated complex in the transition state iss going to the product. find the reason why this factor is introduced here.

People with normal vision cannot focus their eyes underwater if they aren't wearing a face mask or goggles and there is water in contact with their eyes. in a simplified model of the human eye, the aqueous and vitreous humors and the lens all have a refractive index of 1.40, and all the refraction occurs at the cornea, whose vertex is 2.60 cm from the retina.with the simplified model of the eye, what corrective lens (specified by focal length as measured in air) would be needed to enable a person underwater to focus an infinitely distant object? (be careful-the focal length of a lens underwater is not the same as in air! assume that the corrective lens has a refractive index of 1.62 and that the lens is used in eyeglasses, not goggles, so there is water on both sides of the lens. assume that the eyeglasses are 2.05cm in front of the eye.)

Which scientist was the first to propose the heliocentric model of the universe? a. aristotle b. isaac newton c. galileo galilei d. nicolaus copernicus