subject
Physics, 25.04.2020 00:25 hellothere2458

Posner, Snyder, and Davidson (1980)examined spatial attention using arrows as primes. In most of the trials the arrow pointed to the area where the stimulus would appear a moment later, but 20% of the time it did not. They compared reaction times (RTs)for trials when the cue correctly pointed to the stimulus location, for trials when the arrow pointed toward an incorrect position, and for trials with a neutral cue (no arrow).

Which of the following statements was NOT supported by their findings?

A)RTs were slower when the arrow pointed toward an incorrect location.

B)Spatial attention is limited in capacity.

C)We can attend to two different locations without a reduction in performance.

D)RTs were faster for responses for arrows pointing correctly compared to the neutral condition.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Physics

question
Physics, 22.06.2019 00:30
What is relative velocity? in which condition is relative velocity known by adding the velocity of the first body and that of the second body
Answers: 1
question
Physics, 23.06.2019 00:00
The horizontal blue line through the middle of the lens is called the optical axis. as the lamp is moved above or below the axis, keeping the horizontal distance to the center of the lens constant, how does the horizontal distance from the lens to the image change?
Answers: 2
question
Physics, 23.06.2019 01:30
"if the pressure acting on an ideal gas at constant temperature is tripled, its volume isa) reduced to one-third.b) increased by a factor of three.c) increased by a factor of two.d) reduced to one-half"
Answers: 2
question
Physics, 23.06.2019 03:30
Aspring that is stretched 2.6 cm stores a potential energy of 0.053 j. what is the spring constant of this spring?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Posner, Snyder, and Davidson (1980)examined spatial attention using arrows as primes. In most of the...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 29.05.2020 20:04
Questions on the website: 13722367