subject
Physics, 06.01.2021 21:10 kayliehernandez

Plese help m Read the following case and discuss how you would respond to the situation.
PROBLEM:

You have been assigned the position of Environmental Engineer for one of several local
robotics manufacturers whose water discharges flow into a lake in a flourishing tourist area.
Although all the robotics companies in the area are marginally profitable, they compete for
the same customers. Included in your responsibilities is the monitoring of water and air
discharges
at your plant and the periodic preparation of reports to be submitted to the Department of
Natural Resources. You have just prepared a report that indicates that the
level of pollution in the plant's water discharges slightly exceeds the legal limitations. Your
boss, the Plant Manager, says you should regard the excess as a mere
"technicality," and he asks you to "adjust" the data so that the plant appears to be in
compliance. He says that the slight excess is not going to endanger human or fish
life any more than if the plant were in compliance. On the other hand, he says, solving the
problem would require a very heavy investment in new equipment. He
explains, "We can't afford new equipment. It might even cost a few jobs. It will set us
behind our competitors. Besides the bad publicity we'd get, it might scare off
some of the tourist industry, making it worse for everybody."

1) How do you think you should respond to your boss's request? Explain :

2) Define the problem :

3) what are the possible results of decision?

4) is there any information about the situation that is not obvious or available in the paragraph?

5) what are the ethical issues to consider in this situation

6) How did you decide to handle the situation what did you decide to do?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Physics

question
Physics, 22.06.2019 13:00
Ways that industry and agriculture use physical properties to separate substances
Answers: 1
question
Physics, 22.06.2019 21:30
Ineed this now one scientist feels that the changes in global climatic patterns may be good for the health of the biosphere. another scientist feels that sharp changes in climatic patterns could result in the extinction of the biosphere. which of these is the most likely reason the two scientists gave conflicting opinions on the impact of changes in the global climatic pattern? they do not have enough knowledge on the topic. they did not discuss the issue among themselves. they believe conflicting opinion strengthens science. they study different areas of science and have different scientific focuses.
Answers: 1
question
Physics, 22.06.2019 22:00
Should we celebrate the voyages of zheng he mini q answer key
Answers: 3
question
Physics, 23.06.2019 00:30
1. when conducting a test on what kind of music increases the growth of plants, all of the following would fail to meet to fair test standard except (1 point) using different kinds of plants. giving some plants more water than others. exposing the plants to different types of music. using nutrient-rich soil for one and lesser soil for others. 2. engineering uses scientific thinking to solve real-world problems. (1 point) true false 3. what does it mean to test a hypothesis? (1 point) pass a quiz on other scientists’ results analyze only the results from scientific sources not make assumptions about how an experiment will turn out see if the results of an experiment are what the scientist predicted
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Plese help m Read the following case and discuss how you would respond to the situation.
PROB...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 28.04.2021 16:00
question
Social Studies, 28.04.2021 16:00
question
Mathematics, 28.04.2021 16:00
question
Mathematics, 28.04.2021 16:00
question
Mathematics, 28.04.2021 16:00
Questions on the website: 13722363