subject
Physics, 09.03.2021 20:20 heyheyhola

I need help please asap After a scientist publishes a paper, someone else finds evidence that the paper’s conclusions may not be correct. The scientist is unhappy, but studies the new evidence anyway. What should the scientist do as a result of this scientific debate?
A. The scientist should redo his experiment as a result of this debate and modify the new results so that they support his original findings.
B. The scientist should not redo his experiment as a result of this debate because he knows that the other scientist’s evidence is incorrect.
C. The scientist should not redo his experiment as a result of this debate because he knows the new findings must be correct and his previous work will be thrown out.
D. The scientist should redo his experiment as a result of this debate and either confirm this new evidence or change his previous results so that the findings are more accurate.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Physics

question
Physics, 22.06.2019 11:50
The scalar triple product computes the magnitude m of the moment of a force vector f about a specified line. it is m = (r × f) · n, where r is the position vector from the line to the point of application of the force and n is a unit vector in the direction of the line. use matlab to compute the magnitude m for the case where f = [12, −5, 4] n, r = [−3, 5, 2] m, and n = [6, 5, −7].
Answers: 3
question
Physics, 22.06.2019 12:10
Does anyone have the answers to online physics course plato course physics, semester a v3.0
Answers: 2
question
Physics, 23.06.2019 00:00
You can melt ice by applying pressure because the solid/liquid line has a slope.
Answers: 3
question
Physics, 23.06.2019 03:30
Three resistance 4,4 and 6 ohms are joined in the series.the total resistance will be
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
I need help please asap After a scientist publishes a paper, someone else finds evidence that the p...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722361