When an experiment is replicated, how should the results of the two experiments compare?

the results of the first experiment should be less accurate.
the results of the second experiment should be less accurate.
the results of the experiments should be similar.
the results of the experiments should be one hundred percent certain.

The correct answer is:

The results of the experiments should be similar.

The comparison is that the results of the second experiment should be similar to the results of the first experiment. This should be the case because if we do two similar experiments, we should observe similar results as well. Although this is sometimes not the case in science.

Explanation:

The replication decreases variability in experimental results. Stop of variability enhances their significance and the resolution level.The replication is so great in science. Common choices that can change the security of results by being delegated after the experiment has begun include when to stop the experiment, how to interpret the data, and which subgroup organizations to carry out.The replication reduces variability in laboratory results. Stop of variability increases their sense and the confidence level. Finally, the researcher can draw inferences about an experimental.

The results of the experiments should be similar. C

Explanation:

i think the answer is a, hope this : )

the answer to this is proletariats.

hope this : )