Two candidates are running for President of the United States. One candidate wants to reduce taxes for oil companies to encourage off-shore drilling in the US, leading to an increase in the economy (money and jobs brought to the US). The opposing candidate wishes to increase tax rates for oil companies and plans to use the money to address environmental impacts of burning fossil fuels (climate change, habitat destruction, development of alternative fuels, etc.). In 1-2 sentances, describe why it is valuable and beneficial to the decision-making process to explore both political perspectives prior to casting your vote. Then, provide at least 2 pros and 2 cons for both perspectives. Lastly, determine who is most likely to benefit and who is most likely to be harmed by each candidates' proposed plan.