Last year nina made herself stop studying at least 20 minutes before every test, so that she went into the test relaxed. she got as in all her classes. this year she isn’t doing that anymore, so she’s going to do poorly in her classes. which of the following most accurately describes this conclusion?
a) it claims that studying can cause you to do badly on tests.
b) it assumes that only nina's study breaks were responsible for her good grades, which may not be true.
c) it implies that nina is going to stop studying.
d) nina will not pass her class unless she gets a's on her test.
e) both b and c.
f) none of the above are accurate.

the answer is:

in a biology class, the teacher started explaining a new lesson about the dna structure. personally, i found this lecture hard to understand. so i decided to use my critical thinking skills to be able to understand it. i analysed the different ideas, and broke them down into smaller parts to assimilate each. then i started evaluation and tried to link what i am learning with real life experiences so that i can make sure that i know how everything i am learning relates. finally, i started questioning by researching more what i learned and asking more questions that can me through my learning process. reflecting on the information meant that i should review it. all this me greatly understand what i previously found hard to understand.

hope it !

if you break down the data from the global footprint network, china exerts far more pressure on its ecosystems per capita than america in terms of crops, grazing, foresting, and fishing. but where america blows everybody out of the water is carbon emissions per capita