If you are offended and experience revulsion at my eating veal, and i am horrified and repulsed by your eating tofu, or by touching it, is that adequate evidence or an argument that either eating veal or tofu is immoral?

This may be a debate as well but I would like to clarify that:

Revulsion alone at someone else's action is not sufficient to argue that it is harmful or immoral (answer to the question)

We do not say eating tofu is obviously morally neutral, so I do not have to ask about harm or good, instead it is not sufficient to argue that it is harmful or immoral.

dude the first thing it says is that copied answers will get a zero. plus it would take anyone on an incredibly long time to answer. ive seen 2 people asking the exact same question and their questions got taken down. i have the assignment too, and im in the progress of doing it. i suggest going to a more private website, because this is the first place teachers look.

answer; /// decreasing responsiveness to a stimulus to which one is repeatedly exposed;