Compiling data into a table is not a useful method for distinguishing between contrasting observations.

There are no choices available but I am assuming that you are asking whether the statement is a fact or not. The statement above is wrong. Compiling data on tables is an efficient and productive way of comparing and contrasting observations. Scientists use this in their controlled experiments. 

The correct answer is false.

It is false that compiling data into a table is not a useful method for distinguishing between contrasting observations.

To the contrary, yes, it’s true that compiling data into a table is not a useful method for distinguishing between contrasting observations. Any table or graphic that allows you to put information into tabulates in order to classify and compare information, is a good method in the interpretation of results when you are doing research or analysing financial data. Statistics help you to understand information in a quantitative way.  

apart from being against desegregation, governor of georgia eugene talmadge opposed as well to the work progress administration, an ambitious program of the "new deal" created by president franklin d. roosevelt to overcome the great depression after world war i. talmadge disagreed with welfare spending, job training and organized labor. according to his ideas, he thought the government was spending too much money on this, and he wasn't willing to accept a wage higher than georgia's lower average wage. besides, talmadge strongly opposed to the "new deal" as he thought it had communist ideas.