Instructions: the following argument argues for spending taxpayer money to colonize the moon. read the argument and answer the question that follows: topic and question space travel: should our society spend taxpayer money to colonize the moon? ineffective argument i love space. it rocks. it is super important to colonize the moon because we will run out of room on earth. my neighbor who grows organic vegetables says that we are ruining the earth’s environment and we will need a new place to live. i totally agree. i think that another reason we should colonize the moon is that it would be cool. can you imagine living up there and being able to see the earth? wow. my best friend says that living on the moon would be an awesome experience for anyone. the moon is great! why is the argument ineffective? in a paragraph of 7–10 complete sentences, explain why the following parts of the argument are ineffective, and how they can be improved: claim support conclusion clincher point of view transitions submit your review of the argument. do not write a complete argumentative essay.

Claim- weak and to oppinionated

Support- informal, gramaticly inaccurate, uses words like "cool" and "Totally", uses evidence from an irrelevant source

Conclusion- not really a conclusion. one sentence is not a conclusion and it doesnt sum up the rest of the argument.

pov- is written in first person when it should be written in third person.

Transitions- no transitions

hope it helps

in brief the senate may propose or concur with amendments as on other bills.

explanation:

the topics being handled in article 1, section 7, of the u.s constitution, revolve around two issues: the first, the correct procedure to pass legislation regarding revenue production through tax, and the second, the correct process for creating and passing law. in the first case, the text of the constitution literally states that all bills regarding the raising of money, or revenue, need to first be proposed by the house of representatives, although the senate may also play a role here by either proposing such a bill to the house, or agreeing with one being proposed by the house. the second portion, speaks about the process to create, pass and enact legislation. the bill must first be raised by one of the houses, then it must be voted by the plenaries of both houses, and then, it must be presented to the president of the united states, who will either accept it, or veto it, and send it back for reconsideration. if it is not sent back, then the bill is passed into law. if sent back by the president, then the house where the bill originated from will vote again, and if passed by two thirds of the majority, then it goes to the other house, with the observations from the president, for voting. if it passes there as well, then, the bill becomes law, with a few exceptions. this is what is explained in article i, section 7, of the u.s constitution.

hope this have a great

answer: that government dose not want hire eric but hire minorities and woman on affirmative action quotas.

explanation: