Apathological impulse or drive that the person could not control compelled that person to commit a criminal act. this type of crime would be assessed by the legal test named the m'naghten rule. american law institute guidelines. irresistible impulse rule. insanity defense reform act.

The answer is "irresistible impulse rule".

In criminal law, irresistible impulse is a resistance by pardon, for this situation some kind of craziness, in which the litigant contends that they ought not be held criminally at risk for their activities that overstepped the law, since they couldn't control those activities, regardless of whether they knew them to be wrong. It was added to the M'Naghten govern as a reason for vindication in the mid twentieth century.

"Irresistible impulse" can be argued just under the protection of reduced duty, not under the resistance of craziness. In this way it works just as a halfway guard to murder, diminishing the charge to homicide, and giving the judge carefulness as to length of sentence and whether committal would be more proper than detainment.

there is often only a small difference between what is legal and what is ethical when working with competitive intelligence..