This is the power of a court to review a law or an official act of a government employee or agent for constitutionality or for the violation of basic principles of justice. this system of government has powers divided between the central government and regional governments, with central government being supreme. this is the constitutional principle that the law making, executive, and judicial powers be held by different groups and people. this is the system of overlapping powers among judicial, executive, and legislative branches to allow each branch to oversee the actions of the others. this is the belief that the ultimate power of the government rests on the will of the people themselves. this is a form of government in which the power to rule is significantly restrained by a strong constitution or other document. this is the legal notion that the power of government is limited and restrained by legal means and is not at the mercy and whims of individuals. this is a policy that the government's actions towards its citizens must follow established rules and procedures.

1. This is the power of a court to review a law or an official act of a government employee or agent for constitutionality or for the violation of basic principles of justice-------Judicial Review

Judicial review refers to the power of the courts of a nation to inspect the activities of the authoritative, official, and managerial arms of the administration and to decide if such activities are predictable with the constitution. Activities judged conflicting are proclaimed unlawful and, along these lines, invalid and void. The establishment of judicial review in this sense relies on the presence of a composed constitution.

2. This system of government has powers divided between the central government and regional governments, with central government being supreme------ Federalism

Federalism is a sort of government in which the power is separated between the national government and other administrative units. It diverges from a unitary government, in which a focal expert holds the power, and a confederation, in which states, for instance, are plainly predominant.  

All through the twentieth century, the intensity of the federal government extended significantly through enactment and court choices. While much late political discussion has focused on returning capacity to the states, the connection between the central government and the states has been contended over for the greater part of the historical backdrop of the United States.

3. This is the constitutional principle that the law making, executive, and judicial powers be held by different groups and people------ Separation of Powers

Separation of Powers implies that the three branches of government are separated.  

The three branches are  

the Legislative-the part that makes laws  

the Executive - the part that completes (executes) the laws, and  

the Judicial Branch - the courts that choose if the law has been broken.  

Separation of Powers ensures individuals are sheltered. The official branch completes the laws yet can't make laws to make themselves great. Likewise, the legal is in charge of ensuring that culprits are rebuffed with the goal that individuals from the administration or assembly can't disregard the law as the legal can keep an eye on them.

4. This is the system of overlapping powers among judicial, executive, and legislative branches to allow each branch to oversee the actions of the others------ Checks and balances

Checks and balances is an essential rule of American government, ensured by the Constitution, whereby each branch of the administration (executive, judicial, and legislative) has some proportion of impact over alternate branches and may square methodology of alternate branches. Checks and balances keep any one branch from amassing excessively control and energize collaboration between branches and in addition far reaching banter on disputable approach issues.

5.  This is the belief that the ultimate power of the government rests on the will of the people themselves----------- Popular sovereignty

Popular sovereignty refers to the idea that the government gets its capacity from its nationals. This conviction depends on the idea that the government should exist for the sole motivation behind profiting its subjects, and if the legislature isn't doing all that it can to secure its kin, at that point it ought to be disbanded.  

Popular sovereignty is the possibility that the general population of a specific area ought to have the capacity to choose for themselves who will speak to them in their government.

6. This is a form of government in which the power to rule is significantly restrained by a strong constitution or other document----- Limited government

Limited government is a type of government with parts and powers given, and constrained by law, more often than not in a composed constitution. A limited government has just the forces that the general population give it.  

A Limited government is one whose legitimized power and power is confined through assigned and identified specialists. Nations with limited governments have less laws about what people and organizations can and can't do. For example, the United States, it is an unavoidably constrained government, bound to particular standards and activities by a state or elected constitution.

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.

answer; the intervening variable;