Kevin is a judge hearing the case of local dispatch co. v. national transport corp. applying the relevant rule of law to the facts of the case requires kevin to find previously decided cases that, in relation to the case under consideration, are a. as different as possible. b. exactly identical. c. as similar as possible. d. at odds.

The answer is "C",  "​as similar as possible".

Applying the relevant rule of law to the facts of a case regularly requires finding beforehand decided cases that, in response to the case under thought, are as similar as could be expected under the circumstances.  Dissimilar to most civil law frameworks, common law frameworks take after the method of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their own particular past decisions in comparative cases, and all lower courts, should choose decisions complying with past decisions of higher courts.  

is this from a story?

if so, can you tell which one?

~courtney

well, paralell is parallel. i am providing links to .

hope this !

a series circuit is one with all the loads in a row. there is only one path for the electricity to flow. if this circuit was a string of light bulbs, and one blew out, the remaining bulbs would turn off.

unlike in series circuits, a charge in a parallel circuit encounters a single voltage drop during its path through the external circuit. the current through a given branch can be predicted using the ohm's law equation and the voltage drop across the resistor and the resistance of the resistor.

a parallel circuit has certain characteristics and basic rules: a parallel circuit has two or more paths for current to flow through. voltage is the same across each component of the parallel circuit.