How could a photograph most clearly show a positive bias toward a politician?

Answer :

Demonstrate the lawmaker looking worn out and vanquished.  

Explanation:

By demonstrating the politician as drained and defeated, the picture taker endeavor to pick up sympathy for the legislator to get the politician in the administration. This is extremely in the benefit of the lawmaker and in the wake of getting the official workplaces from the government segments, that specific politician pays an enormous add up to the photographer. They even keep up great association with the politician for the focal points he could give them.

Politicians take benefit from showing their image to the public, including  positive biases created by the media, for example, photographies. They use scenarios which have been prepared in full detail, to take pictures that will be considered attractive by their voters, or that can gather more supporters.

For example, see in the photo attached how Hilary Clinton publishes during her presidential campaign a photo where she appears smiling together with a black woman. Such a picture in which she appears in a quite comfortable mood with the other woman, creates the general idea of how supportive she is with minorities or discrimined ones, in this example, two collectives together: black people and women.

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.