Do you agree with the following quote from john locke? the contract between ruler and ruled could not limit the individual's natural entitlement to enjoy life, political equality, and the ownership of property. " why or why not? explain whether you believe locke was right or wrong. give an example to defend your opinion.

I agree with John Locke. The contract between the ruler and ruled should not infringe on the basic rights of the individual. This is because these rights are natural and should not be denied by any government. For example, denying people the right to own property denies them the ability to pursue their dreams and live meaningful lives

a. formula: f=ma or f/m=a

10,000n/1,267kg≈7.9m/

b. formula: a= and s=d/t

speed= 394.6/15

s=26.3m/s

a=

a=1.75m/

c. 7.9-1.75=difference of 6.15m/

d. the force that most likely caused this difference is friction forces

the best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the second choice "less supportive to the war of 1812"

the war of 1812 was a military conflict that lasted from june 1812 to february 1815, fought between the united states of america and the united kingdom, its north american colonies, and its native american allies.

i hope my answer has come to your . god bless and have a nice day ahead!