subject
Social Studies, 07.07.2019 12:30 damientran

Match terms 1 . petition being irreverent toward something sacred 2 . sacrilege telling god he is great 3 . intercession asking god to you 4 . hypocrisy showing deep respect and reverence 5 . formalism god for his 6 . submission following forms of worship without faith 7 . praying for others 8 . adoration telling god you have sinned 9 . veneration kneeling before god 10 . confession play-acting

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30
A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 22:00
What are the impacts of french revolution
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 23:00
For each of the following, mark whether it is a possible confounder (a factor that mixes up the results, making it look like candy is to blame when it's a causal (or causation) link which supports the argument that candy causes criminal behavior (ie, explains how candy leads to criminality ), or neither (an irrelevant factor, something that may cause people to become criminals but has nothing to do with eating candy). choose your answers based only< on the information given. additives in candy- additives found in candy may adversely affect brain development of young children in ways that could contribute towards adult aggression. impulsive personality-- kids who are highly impulsive and have trouble delaying gratification are more likely to eat candy every day as children and more likely to disobey laws as adults. violent abuse-- children who suffer violent abuse are more likely to become violent adults and commit violent crimes. gender- boys are overwhelmingly more likely to commit violent crimes
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:30
Arthur met rottweiler breeders lynda and george at a dog show in rhode island. the couple, who reside in new york state, later sold several rottweiler dogs to arthur who lived in rhode island. arthur later sued lynda and george, claiming that the dogs were sick and infirm. he filed a complaint in rhode island courts, claiming that even though the dogs were sold in new york, the breeders had attended the dog show and advertised in the rottweiler newsletter which was distributed at the event in rhode island. based on the facts, do you think rhode island courts have personal jurisdiction in this case?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Match terms 1 . petition being irreverent toward something sacred 2 . sacrilege telling god he is...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722363