Which best identifies a way in which joe morgan and robert kinsler's accounts of the pearl harbor attack differed?

a. robert kintzler remembered many different details from the attack sense he was far enough away to witness many different things taking place at once. to morgan was on the front lines in was able to see only one event.

b. robert cancer was on april to remember key details from the attack while, joe morgan was able to remember vivid details of the attack on pearl harbor.

c. is not what robert kingsley remembers being showered with gunfire from many planes; john morgan was hiding in fear and only remembers hearing the sound of guns firing.

d. both robert and joe share strikingly similar versions of the attack of the pearl harbor.

C. Is not what Robert Kinzler remembers being showered with gunfire from many planes; John Morgan was hiding in fear and only remembers hearing the sound of guns firing.

Explanation: Joe Morgan was the honorary chaplain of the USS Arizona Memorial. When the attack started, he looked for a place to hide, there, he noticed some of his shipmates shooting back at the aircraft just with their handguns, so he joined them, that's why he just remember hearing the sound of guns firing.

Robert Kinzler was not at Pearl Harbor when the bombs began to fall. He  was a few miles from there, and even though there were many airplanes in the air that day, he only remembers hearing one of them.

as university of miami psychologists debra lieberman and adam smith pointed out in a recent article in the journal current directions in psychological science, humans have social and psychological mechanisms to deter incest. with very few exceptions, marriages between brothers and sisters and between parents and their children are verboten in every human culture. the primary psychological anti-incest mechanism is the yuck response. even the idea of sex with their mom or dad, bro or sis is upsetting to most people. the psychologist jonathan haidt has found that nearly everyone is repelled by the prospect of brother-sister sex, even in hypothetical situations in which there is no chance of pregnancy).

the biological cost of incest

this raises an interesting question: just what’s so bad about incest? sure, having sex with your dad or your sister seems gross — but why? some anthropologists have argued that incest taboos are learned social conventions. this explanation, however, doesn’t make sense to me as it does not explain the widespread existence of anti-incest mechanisms in creatures ranging from cockroaches to chimpanzees. second, the incest taboo is about as close to a universal law as human moral rules get.

why should mechanisms to avoid incest be so widespread both in nature and across human societies? the answer is simple. the problem with having sex close with relatives is that there is an astonishingly high chance that your offspring will be born with a serious birth defect.