Read the sample opening statement. i meet young people all across america who cannot afford the price of a four-year education. that’s wrong. to go to a private four-year institution today is going to cost you eight times what it did in 1980. this problem isn’t going away, and we can’t afford to ignore it any longer. to reduce costs, we need to shift our thinking and turn from the old model. that’s why i support an increased investment in online learning. this will make education more affordable and accessible for all americans. a conclusion that can be drawn about the use of technique in the statement is the candidate is using a personal style to connect with the audience. the candidate is addressing a counterclaim to convince the audience. the candidate is using an impersonal tone to convince the audience. the candidate is promising a plan of action to connect with the audience.

The correct answer is "The candidate is promising a plan of action to connect with the audience."

The speaker here is concisely presenting a specific problem, which is that proper education is simply not affordable to young people at large all over the US. Concrete statistics are thrown out, letting us know how this problem is getting exponentially worse ("a private four year institution today is going to cost you egith times what it did in 1980"). This creates a sense of urgency that sets up a call for action. After that urgent tone is established, the speaker presents a clear plan of action, stating a way to reduce costs: "...we need to shift our thinking and turn from the old model. That's why I support an increased investment in online learning. This will make education more affordable...".

Hope this is helpful!

In this statement, a conclusion that can be drawn is that the candidate is promising a plan of action to connect with the audience. Moreover, the candidate makes use of the personal pronouns "I and we" to address the audience directly and engage them in the speech he or she is giving.

question 1: the kuwaiti government announced us$1.5 million in aid for rohingya refugees.they pointed out that it was imperative to take immediate and concrete steps to ramp up pressure on myanmar to put an end to the violence.and said   that they r just shameful

question 2: the rohingyas were not aloud to be seen as people in myanmar.in the last few years, before the latest crisis, thousands of rohingya were making perilous journeys out of myanmar to escape communal violence or alleged abuses by the security forces.the latest exodus began on 25 august 2017 after rohingya arsa militants launched deadly attacks on more than 30 police posts.rohingyas arriving in an area known as cox's bazaar - a district in bangladesh - say they fled after troops, backed by local buddhist mobs, responded by burning their villages and attacking and killing civilians.