why did many american's oppose getting involved in world war 2
a. americans had close alliances with german and japan
b. america wasn't capable of fighting a large war
c. they were busy dealing with the great depression
d. america was concerned about invasion from mexico

Why did friedrich hayek call expansionary spending dangerous? o he felt it could lower the money supply and cause deflation. o he felt it could lead to inflation and poor decisions by consumers. o he felt it could lead to deflation and poor decisions by consumers. o he felt it could lower available credit and cause a drop in prices.

Abasic premise of the national response framework is that: a. most incidents begin and end locally and are managed at the local or tribal level. b. response partners use nonstandard structures to allow for flexible and scalable responses. c. readiness to act encourages response partners to self-dispatch to an incident scene. d. incidents should be managed at the highest jurisdictional level possible.

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?