The supreme court's decision about gay marriage in 2015 is an example of strict intrepretation judicial activism originalism judicial restraint

You are a member of the jury for a murder case. the prosecution has presented dna evidence linking the defendant to the crime scene. the defense claims that dna evidence using str analysis with 13 markers is not sufficient to reliably distinguish between people. what do you think? a. the defense is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 1 million chance of two people having the same pattern, leaving a reasonable doubt. b. str analysis is not sufficient. the defendant's entire genome should be sequenced. the prosecution will have to consult a genomic library to make sure their dna evidence is valid. c. the prosecution is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 10 billion or greater chance that two people will have the same pattern. this person was at the crime scene. d. dna evidence is not generally accepted by legal experts.

Zach's reaction to this scenario is: "that's not a good decision. she'll probably wind up needing one, if not several, of her friends to cover for her. how do you think that's going to make them feel? " which of kohlberg's levels of development does this response represent?

Which of the following combinations represents the extremes of project organization? a. strong matrix and balanced matrixb. functional and projectizedc. projectized and balanced matrixd. projectized and strong matrixe. strong matrix and functional