Which civil liberty listed in the fifth amendment was at issue in miranda v. arizona a. protection against self-incrimination b. the right of free speech c. the right to a lawyer d. protection against being tried by a biased jury

I think A is your answer, cause that's what pops out at me the most. Hope that helps XD

Option a. The civil liberty of protection against self-incrimination that it is listed in the Fifth Amendment was at issue in Miranda v. Arizona.

Explanation:

In Miranda v. Arizona in 1966 the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self incrimination when they are being detained and prior to being question by the police authorities. This came as a result of a case in which a citizen that had not finished 3rd grade of school, was detained and not informed of his constitutional rights, and during questioning had presumably confessed his criminal activity.

there are conflicting perceptions. what cannot be denied is that despite a long history of discrimination, they finally chose to bow out in grace and handed over power to the majority. it was a painful experience for them to part with their prerogatives and some chose to leave the country. however, they did decide to bite the bullet and go through the process with minimum obstructions.

presently, whites are still a force to reckon with. they are well educated, have technical and business expertise, they understand imperatives of good governance and are responsible for keeping south africa connected with developed countries. despite a bitter history, they are useful team members of the south african team.

it is going to be account a