Which scenario describes a federal court applying the principle of precedent? a. a defendant convicted of a federal crime applying the principle of precedent? b. a federal judge finds a criminal defendant not guilty because she believes his case should have been tried in a state court. c. a court rules that a state is allowed to racially segregate restrooms because earlier courts ruled in favor of segregated buses. d. a judge in a u. s. court of appeals overturns a defendant's conviction on the grounds that the law she violated is unconstitutional.

The answer is C. A court rules that a state is allowed to racially segregate restrooms because earlier courts ruled in favor of segregated buses.

C. A court rules that a state is allowed to racially segregate restrooms because earlier courts ruled in favor of segregated buses.

The principle of precedent is the idea that a previous legal case is either binding, or persuasive for a court when deciding subsequent cases with similar facts. The concept allows courts to yield predictable and consistent results. This is one of the most important values of common-law legal systems. In this case, the fact that earlier courts ruled in favor of segregated buses is very significant for the court's subsequent decision to allow segregated bathrooms.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.

they protect against unsafe foods and medicines being sold

explanation: