Choose all that apply. recent studies investigating factors that contribute to risky behaviors during adolescence no differences in the logical reasoning of adolescents and older individuals. that educating adolescents about how to make better choices to avoid consequences of risky behaviors does not reduce the number of risky behaviors committed by adolescents. that educating adolescents about how to make better choices to avoid consequences of risky behaviors dramatically reduces the number of risky behaviors committed by adolescents. that targeting the psychosocial factors, such as practicing better impulse control, emotion regulation, and delay of gratification, can be an effective approach to reduce risky behaviors in adolescents.

the right answer is: that educating adolescents about how to make better choices to avoid the consequences of risky behaviors does not reduce the number of risky behaviors committed by adolescents.

Because according to studies on the peer influence of adolescents and decision making says that moving past research center investigations of age contrasts in "cool" psychological procedures identified with hazard discernment and thinking, new methodologies have moved concentration to the impact of social and enthusiastic factors on immature neurocognition.  When teenagers invest an expanding measure of energy with their companions, explore recommends that peer-related boosts may sharpen the reward framework to react to the reward estimation of dangerous conduct. As the intellectual control framework step by step develops through the span of the high school years, teenagers develop in their ability to facilitate influence and insight, and to practice self-direction even insincerely stimulating circumstances. These limits are reflected in progressive development in the ability to oppose peer impact.

a factory opens that mass-produces light bulbs.

explanation:

not sure if that's an answer to your questions but this is an example! : )