4) which statement about the effects of the supreme court's decision in dred scott v. sanford is true? a) the supreme court voted unanimously to emancipate, or free, scott. b) the decision can be considered a victory for northern abolitionists. c) the decision can be considered a victory for southern pro-slavery factions. eliminate d) the decision had little impact on the sectional conflict between north and south during this period.

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

Imagine you are driving down the highway and reading a sign that states save the planet don't litter which technique of policy enactment is being used

Preachers who were part of the great awakening urged people to