With a minimum wage in place, are workers who have jobs with this skill being paid more or less than they would have been at equilibrium

A minimum wage is usually set above the equilibrium price (otherwise, there would be no need to set one). This means that workers who have a particular skill will be paid more if hired than they would have been at equilibrium. However, the rise in salary means that businesses most likely will not be able to afford the same number of employees. Therefore, while the salary for employed workers might rise, unemployment might rise with it.

dude have you found the answer? i go to connexus as well but i think the answer is prime minister

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.