Who holds state power in an oligarchy? a single person the representatives of the people the people themselves a small group of people

The answer is: a small group of people

An oligarchal system has government run by a few powerful citizens or families. This minority depending on the extent can rule over a land, kingdom, empire, or nation. An oligarchy is a form of power structure in which power rests with a small number of people ( it has some similarities to a monopoly, and is contrary to a representative democracy). These people may be distinguished by nobility, wealth, family ties, education or corporate, religious or political, military control. We can see many examples of oligarchy in today's world although the term is also associated to a concept used to refer to criticism of the current state of things (when we hear the term putative oligarchies. it is often referred to countries like Russian Federation, Ukraine or even The United States. As we can read:

Putative oligarchies

refer to: "A business group might be defined as an oligarch if it satisfies the following conditions:

(1) owners are the largest private owners in the country (2) it possesses sufficient political power to promote its own interests (3) owners control multiple businesses, which intensively coordinate their activities

answer; i believe that the correct answer is (behavioristic)good luck

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: