Two ways the effect of presidential philosophy can impact judicial decision making

In some countries the judge is chosen by the president, this opportunity for the president to having by his side judges that are nominated by him can bring judges aligned with the presidential philosophy that will then work towards his philosophy in their decisions.

Other way a presidential philosophy can impact judicial decision making is by embracing certain values and beliefs, this can give room for new interpretations of the law. Conservative, Liberalism or any political philosophy will suggest how the law must be interpreted, as it is strictly in the constitution or opening it up for new policies.

a punishment or the threat of punishment used to enforce conformity. enforcement of norms or shared rules of conduct that tell people how to act in specific situations. social control. not everyone internalizes all of society's norms, and some people must be motivated by self-fulfillment.

so, colonists did not want to pay any taxes.  

colonists did not consider themselves british citizens.  

colonists felt no sense of obligation to britain.  

colonists objected to violations of their natural rights. are the answer choices?