Will give brainliest and 30 points
how did jackson solve the issue of states' rights?

a.) he allowed south carolina to secede from the union.
b.)he lowered federal tariffs but affirmed his power to use the military to collect them.
c.)he invaded south carolina and forced john calhoun out of office.
d.)he allowed the southern states to ignore the federal laws with which they disagreed.

Plz me asap! and plz put a real answer! which of the following best describes richard russell's contribution to the war effort? by serving on the senate's naval affairs committee, he investigators learn how the pearl harbor attack was carried out. by to establish military bases like georgia's fort benning, he the state become an important resource to the federal government. by traveling to the war's regions, he develop maps of europe and the pacific. by working with his state's shipyards, he was able to obtain federal contracts to supply the military with ships built in savannah and brunswick.

Aman is charged a fee by the city for having numerous broken cars and auto parts in his front yard. which of the following correctly best describes why the city punish him? he has committed a crime. he is in violation of a city statute. he has violated an amendment of the u.s. constitution. a judge has decided that he is in violation of civil law.

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?