Read the excerpt below justice holmes is explaining the ruling in the majority opinion for schenck versus united states. what point is holmes making about free speech and personal rights?

In the case Schenck v. United States, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote: "The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic."

Explanation:

texas governor sam houston opposed secession, but was unable to prevent it. in this speech, given prior to lincoln's election, he presents the argument that slavery would be safer within the united states than outside of it. it was a prescient argument, and one held by several other southern leaders.

have a good day pls vote me brailyest