subject
Social Studies, 07.12.2019 18:31 isabellamoneill

By combining what you enjoy with what you are good at, you will be able to start:

a. interviewing for jobs.

b. understanding your achievements.

c. researching which jobs make the most money.

d. researching career paths.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 22:30
Explain the difference between a plurality and a majority in terms of choosing a candidate for a primary
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:00
Whether or not a given study has the possibility of causing harm to participants:
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:50
Astudy that involves interviews of adults is eligible for expedited review. the researcher wants to add an adolescent population (aged 12 to 17) to the study and has designed a parental permission and assent process. no additional changes are planned. which of the following statements about review of the revised protocol is accurate? the research would only be eligible for expedited review if the adolescents are capable of understanding the same consent forms used for the adult population.the research would only be eligible for expedited review if the adolescents have been declared to be emancipated minors.the new research would need full review by a convened irb because children are a protected population.unless the nature of the questions would raise the level of risk to > minimal for adolescents, the research would still qualify for expedited review.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50
Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
By combining what you enjoy with what you are good at, you will be able to start:

a. in...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 26.08.2020 16:01
Questions on the website: 13722359