Which of the following is true with regard to the social identity theory? a. it proposes that members of an ingroup are viewed as being homogeneous, while members of an out-group are seen as being heterogeneous. b. it proposes that social identities can never be detrimental as they have no effect on how members of an ingroup view members of an out-group. c. it proposes that members take personal pride in accomplishments but dissociate from the group in the event of any offenses or failures. d. it proposes that people develop only one social identity in childhood that becomes more defined and concrete in the course of their lives. e. it proposes that people have emotional reactions to the failure or success of their group because their self-esteem is tied into the group's performance.

The conflict perspective explains deviance in terms of power and inequality. select the best answer from the choices provided true or false

Hegyes was driving her car when it was negligently struck by a unjian enterprises truck. she was injured, and an implant was placed in her body to counteract the injuries. she sued unjian, and the case was settled. two years later hegyes became pregnant. the growing fetus pressed against the implant, making it necessary for her doctor to deliver the child 51 days prematurely by cesarean section. because of its premature birth, the child had a breathing handicap. suit was brought against unjian enterprises for the harm sustained by the child. was the defendant liable?

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.