How was john sibley able to continue georgia's segregation without violating the federal law of brown vs. board of education?

The U.S. Supreme Court issued its second decision in the case of Brown v. Board of Education. The first decision in 1954 had declared that the “separate but equal” doctrine for public education violated the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment but was silent on how quickly a remedy must take effect.

The Supreme Court came up with a second and final decision for the case. They declared the first case was unconstitutional under the 14th amendment because they said the doctor was separate but equal. Hope this helps! :)

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.

answer; /// the above statement is (true);