Laws permitting, and even requiring, their separation in places where they are liable to be brought into contact do not necessarily imply the inferiority of either race to the other.

which statements summarize justice brown’s message? check all that apply.

- separation does not necessarily create inequality.

-separation implies inferiority.

-laws that permit separation can be constitutional.

-the law cannot permit separation to occur.

-separation always creates inferiority.

- Separation does not necessarily create inequality.

-Laws that permit separation can be constitutional.

Explanation:

Justice Brown's message in this excerpt is about the legal case of Brown v. Board of Education on Segregation/Separation of black kids from white kids in US schools.

A black girl called Linda Brown had her entrance denied to a school of white kids and her father appealed to the Court, they ruled a “separate but equal” doctrine, which admitted that laws could allow the separation of black and white people in facilities and places, as long as the places were equal. In this view the separating laws did not create inequality and neither violate the constitution.

Years later the case had a huge impact and helped ending legal segregation in the United States.

there are no options provided but you can choose among the following gender-neutral pronouns: zir, hir, eir, vis, tem, eir.

in the normal course of maintaining a pronoun-antecedent agreement, we could have used the words his or her but since we are also required to use gender-neutral language, we need to replace it with its equivalent gender-neutral pronoun.