What right did the supreme court claim in marbury v. madison? the right to confirm appointments the right to interpret laws the right to amend the constitution the right to appoint a chief justice

The answer is option B.

The right to interpret laws.

Explanation: The Marbury v Madison  is the case that established the principle of judicial review of Supreme court in United States. The verdict stated that the Supreme court has the power to  interpret any laws and some government actions contradictory to Constitution. This verdict established constitution as the source of law, not just a principles of political and helped to define the boundary between the constitutionally separate executive and Judicial branches of American form of Government.

first of all, it's important to say that the book we shall not be moved, written by joan dash, is about the first strike of women in the united states in the year 1909. the best historical detail to clarify the reader's undertanding is the phrase "general strike". this strike involved women working at a garment factory who decided to protest   long working hours, low wages and brutal conditions. this strike became known as "the new york shirtwaist strike" or "the uprising of the 20,000". the strike mostly involved jewish women who did not speak english or who had a basic knowledge of the english language. finally, the strike went on from november 1909 until february 1910.

1. seasonal

2. frictional unenployment

3. the number of the labor force multiplied by 100 and then subtract the number of unemployed.

4. 4%

5. an increase in prices