Which of the following were the cost of mining

The costs (specifically negative costs) of mining were:

Streams were polluted and forests were cut down

Foreign miners were treated unfairly

Those two are certain, but the last option might also be correct:

Lawlessness and disorder were rampant.

The costs (specifically negative costs) of mining were:

Streams were polluted and forests were cut down

Foreign miners were treated unfairly

Those two are certain, but the last option might also be correct:

Lawlessness and disorder were rampant.

threatening rain forest organisms

Explanation:

threatening rain forest organisms

Explanation:

the candidate i think had the weakest support for his or her claims was mr. democrat. he spoke of making new schools but when he was in an argument with mrs. evirons she brought up many other good and important points in which he couldnt back up with good replies.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.