Offering 98 points and brainliest, asap! choose a country of north america to research other than the united states. view the map to you choose. research your country. resources include the virtual library and the cia world factbook. use this worksheet to locate and note the information about the country you choose. compare the standard of living of the country you chose with that of the united states. this should be written in a paragraph of at least three to five sentences. examine the information you have gathered. determine whether or not you recommend this country for your family’s new home. write down the reasons you do or do not recommend it in at least three sentences. create your recommendation to present to your family. you may choose the format of your presentation. suggestions include podcast, video, slideshow, and article. see this example for inspiration.

Which three sentences in the story indicate that the passage is an ex nihilism type of creation story?

What did mrs zog say when mr zog said he was going mountain climbing in the himalayas answer key?

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.